Labor Law Updates for April – 2021

INFINITI HR is happy to provide Monthly State Law Updates as a service to our subscribers. These briefs provide a general description and are not meant to be all inclusive of compliance requirements. This list is not inclusive of all legislative changes for employers across the U.S. Changes may have been addressed in previous updates, which can be accessed from our blog.

Employers are encouraged to work with their Inspiring HR Consultant before making policy changes to capture the full requirements of these laws.

 Some of the notable upcoming State Changes in this issue are as follows:

CALIFORNIA

California – Rehire Program – Effective 4/16/2021

New CA legislation – SB 93 requires certain employers in the hospitality industry to offer rehire opportunities to those qualified employees who were laid off for reasons due to Covid-19 prior to January 2020.  Affected employers include hotels, event centers, building and airport service providers, airport hospitality and private clubs and specific detailed records must be maintained for 3 years.  The requirements are set to expire on December 31, 2024.

ILLINOIS

Chicago, Illinois – Vaccine Anti-Retaliation Ordinance – Effective April 21, 2021

The City of Chicago enacted the Vaccine Anti-Retaliation Ordinance which provides all workers in Chicago with rights to obtain COVID-19 vaccinations during their work hours and imposes significant penalties for employer violations who require employees to get vaccinations on the worker’s own time.

The IL COVID vaccine ordinance, as detailed in our March Update, states employers that require their workers to get vaccinated must compensate the worker at the worker’s regular rate of pay for the time the worker takes to get the vaccination, up to four hours per dose, if the vaccination appointment time is during a shift. Employers requiring that their workers get vaccinated may not require the worker to use paid time off or paid sick leave for the missed time.

The potential penalties against employers and remedies to workers are also significant. Employers found in violation of the Vaccine Anti-Retaliation Ordinance shall be liable for a fine of between $1,000 and $5,000.  Additional damages payable to employees who file a civil action for violations also apply.

The Ordinance will be lifted when the Commissioner of Public Health makes a written determination that the threat to public health posed by COVID-19 has diminished to the point that the ordinance can safely be repealed.

Illinois – Equal Pay Act – Effective April 2021

The Illinois legislature recently passed legislation amending the Business Corporations Act and the Illinois Equal Pay Act (IEPA). The IEPA is the state statute to ensure that individuals are compensated without to regard to their sex or race. While this amendment does not add any protected categories to the IEPA’s provisions, it does implement new requirements for employers.

Report EEO Data in Annual Reports to Secretary of State

This amendment requires each corporation that is required to file an EEO-1 report (100+ EE’s) to include in annual corporate reports filed with the IL Secretary State information substantially similar to employment data required by Section D of the federal EEO-1 form. The Secretary of State will publish data on the gender, race, and ethnicity of corporation’s employees on the Secretary of State’s website. This obligation applies to corporate reports filed on or after January 1, 2023.

New Equal Pay Certificate Obligation for Employers with More Than 100 Employees

New legislation requires private employers with more than 100 employees in Illinois to obtain an “equal pay registration certificate.” To obtain the certificate, the employer must provide EEO-1 data plus the total wages paid to each employee during the prior calendar year. The Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act, which includes wages, salaries, earned commissions, and other forms of compensation.

The employer also must submit a statement signed by a corporate officer, legal counsel, or other authorized agent of the business for each county in which business has facility or employees that includes the following representations:

  1. The business is in compliance with Title VII, the Equal Pay Act of 1963, the Illinois Human Rights Act, the Equal Wage Act, and the Equal Pay Act of 2003;
  2. The average compensation for its female and minority employees is not consistently below the average compensation, as determined by the Illinois Department of Labor (IDOL) rules, for its male and non-minority employees within each job categories in the Employer Information Report EEO-1 report for which an employee is expected to perform work;
  3. The business does not restrict employees of one sex to certain job classification and makes retention and promotion decisions without regard to sex;
  4. Wage and benefit disparities are corrected when identified; and
  5. The business reports how often the employer evaluates wages and benefits to ensure compliance with above-listed statute.

The certification requires the employer to certify whether it uses certain approaches in setting compensation and benefits. An employer who does not obtain a certificate or whose certificate is suspended or revoked after the IDOL investigation is subject to mandatory civil penalty equal to 1% of “gross profits.” Existing corporations must obtain certificates within three years after the effective date of the new law. Recertification is required every two years.

Illinois – Human Rights Act – Effective March 23, 2021

Illinois currently has a ban-the-box law restricting employers from asking about criminal history generally until after an interview. Illinois is now poised to join the ranks of states that either prohibit or limit employers’ ability to evaluate applicants’ and employees’ criminal conviction record, but also Illinois will implement a retaliation standard that more heavily favors employees. The Illinois legislature has amended the IL Human Rights Act and the Governor is likely to sign this legislation. These changes will make substantial changes to an employers’ hiring and employment practices. One such amendment put in place new procedures that must be followed if an employer seeks to disqualify an applicant or employee based on a criminal record;

Amendment to IL Human Rights Act Regarding Criminal Convictions

The current language in the Illinois Human Rights Act (IHRA) prohibits discrimination, harassment, and certain forms of retaliation. This recent amendment will make it a civil rights violation for employers to discriminate against individuals based upon their conviction record unless

  1. There is a “substantial relationship” between the offense at issue and the individual’s employment; or
  2. The individual’s employment involves an unreasonable risk to property or the safety of specific individuals or general public.

If either of these criteria are met, then the employer may consider and individuals conviction record in making an employment decision.

This amendment goes to great lengths to limit what constitutes a “substantial relationship” or “unreasonable risk”.

Substantial Relationship: Considers whether the job offers an opportunity for the same offense to occur and whether the circumstances leading to the conduct for which the individual was convicted will recur in the job.

The relevant factors to consider for either substantial relationship or an unreasonable risk to property and safety are:

  1. The length of time since conviction.
  2. The number of convictions that appear on an individual’s conviction record.
  3. The nature and severity of the conviction and its relationship to the safety and security of others.
  4. The facts or circumstances surrounding the conviction.
  5. The age of the individual at the time of the conviction.
  6. The evidence of rehabilitation effort.

This requires the employer to conduct a fact-specific inquiry and analyze all of the previous factors. If the employer makes a preliminary decision to disqualify the individual after considering the above factors, then the employer must notify the individual in writing of the preliminary determination.

The employer must then provide the affected individual five business days to respond before the employer engages in an interactive process and considers information provided by the applicant about why the conviction should not be considered or be dispositive before deciding to disqualify the applicant.

Suppose the employer decides to move forward to disqualify the individual. In that case, they must provide a written final notice identifying the conviction at issue, explain the basis for the decision, advise any internal procedures for requesting reconsideration, and advise the employee or applicant of the right to file a charge of discrimination.

VIRGINIA

VA – Minimum Wage Increase – Effective 5/1/2021

Barring any last-minute intervention, Virginia’s minimum wage for non-exempt employees will rise to $9.50 per hour on May 1, 2021. Employers should prepare now by reviewing pay rates and budgeting for any required increases.

In 2020, the General Assembly passed legislation to raise the minimum wage in stages to $15.00 per hour, and to eliminate certain minimum wage exceptions.

The scheduled new hourly amounts are as follows:

  • Effective May 1, 2021: $9.50
  • Effective January 1, 2022: $11.00
  • Effective January 1, 2023: $12.00
  • *Effective January 1, 2025: $13.50; and
  • *Effective January 1, 2026: $15.00

Tipped minimum wage continues at $2.13 per hour. “Tipped employees” are defined as employees who regularly receive over $30.00 per month in tips.

Under the new law, employers may pay a “training wage” at 75 percent of the minimum wage for employees in on-the-job training programs lasting less than 90 days.

The law also applies Virginia minimum wage to persons:

  • whose employment is covered by the Fair Labor Standards Act,
  • employed in domestic service in a private home, persons normally paid on the amount of work done,
  • with intellectual or physical disabilities (except those whose employment is covered by a special certificate issued by the U.S. Secretary of Labor),
  • employed by an employer with less than four employees, and
  • minors under the jurisdiction of a juvenile and domestic relations district court.

The Virginia minimum wage does not apply to individuals participating in the U.S. Department of State’s au pair program, those employed as temporary foreign workers, or individuals employed by amusement or recreational establishments, organized camps, or religious or nonprofit educational conference centers.

*In 2024, the General Assembly would have to re-enact the increases to $13.50 and $15.00 per hour for the years 2025 and 2026.

Employers must be aware of the expansion of these laws and how the laws affect their business.

Interested in other current employment trends? Click the link to view the recent blog: Labor Law Updates for March 2021 or check back for more on human resources, payroll, insurance, and benefits.

This article does not constitute legal advice and there are subtle variations in employment law as it pertains to this topic, depending on where your business operates. It is strongly suggested that you seek consultation or legal counsel before making decisions about policies.

 

 

Labor Law Updates for March 2021

INFINITI HR is happy to provide Monthly State Law Updates as a service to our subscribers. These briefs provide a general description and are not meant to be all inclusive of compliance requirements. This list is not inclusive of all legislative changes for employers across the U.S. Changes may have been addressed in previous updates, which can be accessed from our blog.

Employers are encouraged to work with their Inspiring HR Consultant before making policy changes to capture the full requirements of these laws.

 Some of the notable upcoming State Changes in this issue are as follows:

ILLINOIS PROVIDES EMPLOYERS WITH VACCINE LEAVE GUIDANCE

Illinois – Vaccine Leave Guidance – Effective March of 2021

MANDATORY VACCINATION PROGRAMS:

Under the Illinois Minimum Wage Law (IMWL) and the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), if an employer requires employees to get vaccinated, the time the employee spends obtaining the vaccine is likely compensable, even if it is non-working time.

Mandatory vaccination requirements by employers should be combined with paid leave for employees to receive the 1st and 2nd dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, or the employer should otherwise provide compensation for the time taken by the employee to comply with an employer-mandated vaccine requirement.

OPTIONAL VACCINATION PROGRAMS:

Employees that choose to obtain the vaccine voluntarily should be allowed to utilize sick leave, vacation time or other paid time off for employees to receive the 1st and 2nd dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Employers that do not choose and are not obligated to provide any paid leave, should consider offering the employee FLEX time to allow the employee to become vaccinated without having to take unpaid time. If the employer does not wish to provide FLEX time, the employer should allow the employee flexibility to take the time off unpaid.

VACCINATION REQUIREMENTS FOR EMPLOYEE’S FAMILY MEMBERS:

The Employee Sick Leave Act (ESLA) requires employers to allow their employees to use employer-provided sick leave benefits for absences due to, among other things, medical appointments of the employee’s child, stepchild, spouse, domestic partners, sibling, parent, mother-in-law, father-in-law, grandchild, grandparents, or stepparent on the same terms upon which the employee is able to use personal sick leave benefits for their employee’s own illness or injury.

An appointment to receive the COVID-19 vaccine 1st dose or 2nd dose will qualify as a permissible medical appointment for purposes of the ESLA if the employer allows the use of an employee’s sick leave benefits for purposes of vaccinations. Therefore, employers should allow the use of sick leave benefits by an employee for purposes of the employee taking a qualifying family member to receive the 1st dose or 2nd dose of the COVID-19 vaccine.

In order to promote health and safety in the workplace, the Illinois Department of Labor recommends that employers review their leave and vaccination policies and revise accordingly to provide leave, time, and flexibility in order to encourage employees to obtain the 1st dose and 2nd dose of the COVID-19 vaccine.

 Employers and employees should also review the Illinois Department of Health and EEOC and COVID websites for the most recent information on the COVID-19 vaccine.

NEW YORK MANDATES PAID TIME OFF FOR COVID-19 VACCINATIONS

NY – Vaccine Paid Time Off – Effective 3/12/2021

New York employers are now required to provide employees with paid time off for COVID-19 vaccination under the following guidelines:

  • All employees are eligible to receive up to four (4) hours of Paid Time Off per vaccine injection; up to eight (8) hours total. This leave is in addition to any other paid time off and/or paid sick leave.
  • The time off must be paid at the employee’s regular rate of pay.
  • Employers are prohibited from requiring employees to use any other available paid time off and/or sick leave before providing leave under this law.

In addition to the paid time off requirement, the new law prohibits discrimination or retaliation against any employee who exercises their rights under the law.

 At this time, it is unclear whether employees who have already used company-provided or mandated paid sick time to obtain the vaccine might be entitled to reinstatement of that time. We anticipate guidance from the New York Department of Labor may clarify this question.

This law remains in effect until December 31, 2022.

PENNSYLVANIA – PHILADELPHIA EXPANDS BACKGROUND CHECK RESTRICTIONS

Philadelphia – Background Check Changes – Effective 3/21/2021

In addition to federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) and Pennsylvania’s statewide Criminal History Record Information Act (CHRIA), Philadelphia also maintains local ordinances restricting employers’ use of criminal records and credit histories in employment screening.  Bill No. 200479 will expand specific restrictions on background screenings.

The expansion includes the following changes:

  • The definition of a “covered employee” now covers any person employed or permitted to work at or for a private employer within the geographic boundaries of the city including, an independent contractor, transportation network company driver, rideshare driver or other gig economy worker.
    • A covered “private employer” also includes any third-party person or entity that facilitates the relationship of work for pay between two other parties, as full-time or part-time employees or as independent contractors.
  • In the past, federal, state and local restrictions of criminal records and credit histories were only specific to “applicants” in employment screenings. The restrictions now include all applicants and current employees.
  • Philadelphia’s credit ban law, which makes employment credit screenings off-limits for most employers and jobs, previously exempted “any law enforcement agency or financial institution” from its restrictions. The expanded law removes this exemption from the credit ban and now includes law enforcement agencies and financial institutions to conduct credit screenings as long as the purpose to obtain an applicant’s or employee’s credit information is in pursuant to state or federal law or where the job requires an employee to be bonded under city, state or federal law.

Employers must be aware of the expansion of these laws and how the laws affect their business.

Interested in other current employment trends? Click the link to view the recent blog: Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA) – March 2021 Changes or check back for more on human resources, payroll, insurance, and benefits.

Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA) – March 2021 Changes

As we shared with our readers previously, the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA) expired on December 31, 2020 – and with it, the obligation for covered employers to provide emergency paid sick leave and emergency family and medical leave.

Shortly before the end of 2020, Congress extended the tax credit that accompanied use of FFCRA to employers who wanted to voluntarily provide FFCRA paid leave after December 31st, 2020 through March 31, 2021.  

The American Rescue Plan, signed into law on March 11, 2021, extends the tax credit for voluntarily providing FFCRA leave through September 30, 2021 and makes related changes. These provisions of the relief bill include the following: 

  • Extends the tax credits available for employers who voluntarily provide FFCRA leave from March 31, 2021 to September 30, 2021. 
  • Resets the 10-day limit for the tax credit for paid sick leave under the FFCRA beginning April 1, 2021. As a result, an employer could voluntarily provide an additional 10 days of FFCRA paid sick leave beginning April 1, 2021 through September 30, 2021, and would be eligible for a tax credit for doing so. But employers are not required to do so. 
  • Provides that the tax credits are available for paid sick leave and paid family leave provided for the additional following qualifying reasons: 
    • the employee is obtaining immunization (vaccination) related to COVID-19; 
    • the employee is recovering from any injury, disability, illness or condition related to such vaccination; or 
    • the employee is seeking or awaiting the results of a diagnostic test or medical diagnosis for COVID-19 (or their employer has requested such a test or diagnosis). 
  • Adds non-discrimination rules to provide that no tax credit is available if the employer, in determining availability of the paid leave, discriminates against highly compensated employees, full-time employees, or employees on the basis of tenure with the employer. This provision appears to be designed to compel employers who make the decision to voluntarily provide leave do so in an equitable manner, without discriminating against certain categories of workers. 

We recommend you discuss these changes with your HR consultant or an employment law attorney. If you decide to continue allowing FFCRA leave, update your policies and forms, and communicate the changes to your employees accordingly. 

Employers who choose to end the leave entitlement are reminded that some employees may still be entitled to leave (paid or unpaid) under other laws such as the regular Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), state and local laws, or company policy. 

Interested in other current employment trends? Click the link to view the recent blog: “We Want Four Day Work Weeks!” or check back for more on human resources, payroll, insurance, and benefits.

This article does not constitute legal advice and there are subtle variations in employment law as it pertains to this topic, depending on where your business operates. It is strongly suggested that you seek consultation or legal counsel before making decisions about policies.

“We Want Four Day Work Weeks!”

Let’s be honest, don’t we ALL look forward to holiday weekends when the day off falls on either side of the weekends or our typical days off? And yet, the work gets done. Upon economic recovery from COVID-19, working less hours overall may not be a good long term strategy, but it raises a question about our motivation and ability to focus when a carrot, (an extra day off?), is dangled in front of us. For industries where it is feasible and safety isn’t compromised, perhaps a compacted work week might be a real competitive edge:

Tori began working remotely for the first time when a COVID-19 shelter-in-place mandate went into effect in her area. Though she hated to admit it, instead of feeling relieved she was disappointed when she received news that she was now able to head back to the office.

 She’d enjoyed the flexibility that working from home afforded her; she enjoyed not having to commute and found she was able to work longer days without the need to worry about beating traffic. Many times, business was so slow on Fridays that she was able to complete what she needed to do by putting in a few extra hours on Thursday. 

She asked herself: How can I enjoy similar flexibility after I return to the office?

The pandemic turned the working world a bit on its head for many industries. Schedules shifted, commutes lessened (or disappeared), meetings were held via Zoom or Teams, and in terms of the work being done, it may have been business as usual for some industries. Some businesses also discovered the cost savings of not having to power, equip and staff offices nearly as often.

As restrictions ease and workers head back to an office, are there lessons to be learned from the changes that were implemented, successfully, in many companies? Flexibility, which may not have been foremost on company leaders’ minds prior to shelter-in-place orders, may now be something to be considered and explored.

If a job is no longer tied to a strict eight hours per day/five days-a-week schedule and the work still gets done, what changes could be reasonably considered?

Enter the four-day work week.

The four-day work week (or “compressed work week”), has already been in use by various companies and industries in different countries for years, and has met with varying levels of success. The concept is to shorten the week into longer workdays in fewer days per week. The most common example has been four, 10-hour days.

In 2019, the Japanese subsidiary of Microsoft went to a four-day week and found that it improved worker productivity by 40%. Andrew Barnes took his New Zealand-based company Perpetual Guardian to a four-day week and it was so successful ended up co-authoring a book about it, as well as founding a nonprofit organization dedicated to raising global awareness of the work-ability of the four-day week.

According to a SHRM survey, currently one-third of employers in the U.S. offer compressed work weeks, and it is predicted by the organization that this number will grow, though the U.S. in general has been slow to move away from the century-old traditional work week. A Harris Poll Survey from spring 2020 showed that 82 percent of employed Americans say they would be “somewhat” or “very willing” to work longer hours in a period of four days and 71 percent of those workers believe it will make them more productive. It also is seen as a necessity by some workers in this modern era. According to a 2019 Deloitte survey, 22 percent of millennials, one of the largest groups of employees in the market today, stated that they plan to leave their current jobs due a lack of work/life balance.

An extra day off per week that doesn’t eat into their vacation and PTO may allow employees time to:

  • Spend with family and friends
  • Pursue hobbies/interests
  • Volunteer at a child’s school or other organizations
  • Further their personal education with a class or seminar
  • Run errands
  • Simply refresh, recharge, and reorganize

But what about coverage considerations? Clients who may call or orders that need to be filled on that day off? A business need not shut down completely on a four-day week; a rotating schedule of days off could allow employees to still cover client and work demands and get the extra personal time that could help avoid burnout and reduce daily stress. Returning from work post-COVID-19, compressed weeks may also help to reduce crowds in the workplace. Individual performance goals will still need to be met, and productivity needs to be measured to ensure the company stays on track.

So what should we be aware of?

  • One-size may not fit all: Just as all jobs are not suited for work-from-home, alternative workweeks may not fit the bill in some industries (see below.)  Some employees also simply may not want to work 10-hour days due to personal schedule needs. Employee pulse surveys should be taken prior to considering and implementing such a change over a whole company as a unit. Longer shifts may also not bode well in safety sensitive positions.
  • State law compliance: states that require daily overtime, such as California, may have additional formal administrative steps to follow to ensure that a switch to an alternative workweek (one other than a traditional 40 hour/five day week), is done properly and does not run companies afoul of wage and hour laws. 
  • Equal availability: there is a recognized gap in the flexibility that has been typically allowed for office or tech positions versus those front-line or in other traditionally blue-collar roles. No positions should be overlooked as any worker, no matter the job, can experience stress and burnout. The possibility of disparate impact will need to be explored if companies are considering putting only part of their business function on a shorter schedule.
  • Addressing issues: Growing pains are a natural part of any new schedule. Productivity may temporarily dip, time clocks may have hiccups, or some employees may not adapt well to the new situation. Address any issues immediately so they don’t start a downhill slide.

While not a NEW concept, a four-day work week is one that has not always been considered or explored in the past. The time for its renewed consideration has perhaps arrived, as many companies that have had to flex and adapt over the past few months found that even when moving away from a traditional work environment, work was still able get done, and done well.

Click the link to view the recent blog: Successfully Responding to a DOL Audit or check back for more on human resources, payroll, insurance, and benefits.

Successfully Responding to a DOL Audit

In the wake of COVID-19, will there will be an increase of audits by the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) to ensure decisions and actions made by employers adjusting to COVID were lawful?

Only time will tell, but INFINITI HR and our partners at Inspiring HR wants you to be prepared.  See our quick reference sheet below on how to respond if the DOL comes knocking at your door.

Click the link to view the recent blog: Labor Law Updates for February 2021 or check back for more on human resources, payroll, insurance, and benefits.

Labor Law Updates for February 2021

These briefs provide a general description and are not meant to be all inclusive of compliance requirements. This list is not inclusive of all legislative changes for employers across the U.S. Changes may have been addressed in previous updates, which can be accessed from our blog.

Employers are encouraged to work with their Inspiring HR Consultant before making policy changes to capture the full requirements of these laws.

 Some of the notable upcoming state changes in this issue are as follows:

CALIFORNIA – MANDATED REPORTER TRAINING

California – Mandated Reporter – Effective 1/1/2021

Effective in January 2021, the state of CA requires all employers of five or employees who employ minors to have Mandated Reporters in their workplace to report suspected cases of child abuse and neglect. Mandated Reporters are all supervisors of minor employees and authorized human resource representatives and must:

Covered employers must also have a Mandated Reporter policy in their handbooks.

FAQs

MICHIGAN ALTERS COVID-19 WORKER QUARANTINE REQUIREMENTS

MI COVID-19 Quarantine Reqs. – As of January 1, 2021

In order to tighten the leave parameters for employees affected by COVID-19, Governor Whitmer issued an executive order that limits the availability of job-protected leave. On August 27, 2020 the Governor of Michigan issued an Executive Order tightening the symptoms of COVID-19 which by definition would be imposed for employees who feel that they are at risk of infecting others with COVID-19.

On Dec. 30, 2020, the governor signed Senate Bill 1258 (SB 1258) into law, modifying COVID-19 worker quarantine requirements, most likely in response to updated CDC guidelines.

SB 1258 addresses the timelines and conditions that must be met before they return to work for the following categories:

  • An employee who tests positive for COVID-19.
  • An employee who displays the principal symptoms of COVID-19but has not yet tested positive.
  • An employee who has had close contact (as defined by the CDC guidelines) with someone who tests positive for COVID-19.

Under SB 1258, workers are no longer required to stay home nor are they protected if they have come into close contact with someone who merely displays the principal symptoms of COVID-19.

The new law adds an exception for certain employees (i.e., health care workers, first responders, etc.) who would otherwise be subject to quarantine, who have not yet tested positive for COVID-19, and who are not experiencing symptoms, to be allowed to participate in onsite operations when necessary if their failure to do so would cause serious harm or danger to public health or safety.

Employers complying with SB 1258, CDC & OSHA guidelines, executive orders, and all other relevant state and federal regulations as an affirmative defense for liability in returning employees to work.

VIRGINIA MAKES COVID-19 STANDARDS PERMANENT

Virginia – Permanent COVID-19 Standards – Effective 1/27/2021

Effective Jan. 27, the Virginia Safety and Health Codes Board became a permanent standard for COVID-19. The “Final Permanent Standard for Infectious Disease Prevention of the SARS-CoV-2 Virus that Causes COVID-19” will be enforced by the Virginia Occupational Safety and Health program (VOSH) and took effect on January 27.

The new requirement modifies a temporary standard established in 2020, and employers will need to adjust their practices to reflect these changes.

Specifically, employers must adjust to all required revisions to Infectious Disease Preparedness and Response Plans and training requirements that are effective March 26.

The modifications and requirements are extensive, and we recommend that employers seek HR or legal consult for assistance before attempting to comply to the new standards.

Click the link to view the recent blog: No. You May NOT Wear PJ’s To The Team’s Video Conference. or check back for more on human resources, payroll, insurance, and benefits.

No. You May NOT Wear PJ’s To The Team’s Video Conference.

POLICY FROM MANAGEMENT: “WEAR CLOTHES TO WORK.  THANK YOU.”

As the pandemic continues, so does the need for more structured guidance for your ever-growing remote workforce. Dressing down with all-day lounge wear, gym wear and pajamas is becoming a new norm for home office attire as the pandemic rolls into months of not reporting to a formal office environment.

Why is this an issue?

A new survey from CouponFollow indicates that “business professional, business casual, and smart casual dressers all reported higher levels of productivity than those who dressed in gym clothes and pajamas. Roughly 80% of the more formal dressers said they felt productive throughout the day, compared to just 70% of those in gym clothes and 50% of those in pajamas.”

Promoting Corporate Culture at Home

Maintaining a corporate image is still important in a remote setting as videoconferencing has risen dramatically for internal team collaboration, as well as for external sales and building client rapport. The video conferencing industry is reporting that 77% of businesses are using online video communication for their remote workforce and it is predicted to continue to increase steadily through 2022, according to a report from GetVOIP. Businesses have discovered they are cutting overhead — time and travel costs — through video communication.

Without a policy addressing video communication etiquette, organizations will struggle at projecting professionalism across their remote workforce. A recent Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) article interviewed several employment attorneys who cite their concerns. “Before COVID-19, a work-from-home dress-code policy would have seemed like a strange concept,” said Megan Toth, an attorney with Seyfarth in Chicago. “But, with the recent increase of remote workers and video-conferences, this has become a real issue for some employers.”

Here are a few key recommendations in rolling out a revised dress code and video conferencing policy for your remote workforce:

  • Promote remote working as a benefit that allows for hours and standard dress code flexibility as long as performance deadlines are being met. Be clear about expectations for attendance and professional presentation for virtual meetings.
  • Create a remote work policy addendum to your employee handbook which includes standards for home office space, technology, Wi-Fi and mobile device protocols, availability expectations, and dress code options;
  • Consider a video-conferencing policy that addresses camera use etiquette including beverage and food consumption, parameters for background settings, and professional attire and grooming. Include safety language for accessing virtual “meetings” on the road and limiting outside distractions while conducting both internal and external calls.
  • Ask employees to use common sense when representing your organization via video chat. Taking a video call by the pool in a swimsuit and sunglasses, while sipping a frozen drink may not align with the corporate image you want to project to the outside world.
  • Rethink gender neutrality when adopting organizational work attire. Does your current dress code policy contain different standards for men vs. women? Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination based on gender identity and sexual orientation, and courts have ruled that gender specific limitations for dress codes and grooming standards where one sex imposes a greater burden is discriminatory.
  • Adopt language to align with your organizational mission and vision for the wearing of clothing and accessories that openly express political or social justice views. A lot of companies are adopting policies banning this type of attire in the workplace promoting inclusivity and safe work environments.
  • Enforce these policies, along with other remote work structures, fairly and consistently across your workforce to limit liability of discrimination.

“Nearly 52% of employees working remotely indicate their companies have asked them to abide by a dress code policy” according to CouponFollow. A recent Gallup poll article states “the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the trend toward remote work and has made companies’ policies toward it even more crucial to their success.”

Also, don’t miss out on our FREE reference tools for remote work:

Click the link to view the recent blog: What You Need to Know About Recruiting and Hiring Remote Workers or check back for more on human resources, payroll, insurance, and benefits.

This article does not constitute legal advice and there are subtle variations in employment law as it pertains to this topic, depending on where your business operates. It is strongly suggested that you seek consultation or legal counsel before making decisions about policies.

What You Need to Know About Recruiting and Hiring Remote Workers

“Remote employees. Distributed workforce. Telecommuting. Work from home. A virtual job. Work from anywhere.”

These terms, like many other words, have a broader impact and a new meaning for people this year.

Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of companies with employees who worked either 100% or partially remote had been growing significantly in recent years. Per Flexjobs.com, there was a 159% increase in remote work between 2005-2017.  A 2019 survey conducted by a workspace provider, IWG, indicated that 80 percent of employees would opt to work for an employer who offered this flexibility over one who did not.  To quote another term used quite a bit in 2020, remote work is becoming a “new normal” for many workers in the United States.

When the pandemic necessitated business shutdowns or modifications across the United States earlier this year, many employers were forced to temporarily close their offices or facilities to their employees. For many companies, it was their first experience having their employees work from their homes instead of onsite. According to research conducted at Stanford, 42% of the U.S. labor workforce is now working remotely on a full-time basis.

While many employers have embraced this change and are in no rush to revert back to having everyone in the office, there are others who are unhappy with it, and they wish to have their employees back in the office again. These employers are concerned about potential issues such as productivity slowdown, lack of oversight and management of employee activity, communication and team cohesion breakdown, and how to monitor technology use.

However, given the statistic mentioned earlier about 80% of potential hires choosing a flexible employer who is open to remote work over one that is not, employers need to think about the ramifications of being closed off to remote hiring. If companies aren’t receptive to allowing employees to work remotely, it will likely have a negative impact on attracting new talent, employee retention and morale, and ultimately the overall financial health of the organization.

How can employer concerns about remote working be addressed so they are open to the idea of a successful remote or partially remote workforce?

Here are some suggestions of practices employers can put in place to make remote work successful:

  • Put together and implement a Remote Work Policy for employees to review and sign off on. This policy can address areas such as work expectations, communication with their team and manager, and technology use and guidelines.
  • Investigate and consider investing in employee monitoring software. There are many options to consider, as there has been significant growth in this particular industry this year due to increased demand. However, companies should consider if going this route will imply that they do not trust their employees.
  • Ensure that solid procedures are in place to track the hours for Non-Exempt workers.
  • Look over the current Job Descriptions for all positions and ensure they are up-to-date and accurate. This is also an opportunity to modify accordingly for any parameters that have changed as a result of a role now being remote or partially remote.

Another factor that employers can focus on are the many positive aspects of remote work! They include:

  • Access to a broader talent pool, companies will no longer be limited to those candidates within commuting distance of their offices.
  • Less employee absences/tardiness/missed work due to illness, traffic or mass transit delays, inclement weather, doctor appointments, school closings.
  • Monetary savings for company on real estate, electricity, office furniture, maintenance, cleaning and other costs related to onsite facilities.
  • Less cars on the road commuting reduces traffic, and has benefits for the environment.
  • Employees can be more productive at home due to having more control over their work environment: managing their own time, not having to factor in commute time to their work hours, reduced noise levels, less distractions, temperature of office.
  • Employee stress levels are reduced by taking away commuting time and hassles, cost savings of taking away commute and not having to buy or make lunch, more work/life balance, more time for family and hobbies. When employees are less stressed, their level of satisfaction and loyalty to their employer greatly increases.
  • The increase in resources for remote work including co-working space and video conferencing capabilities, which also saves money on business travel.

Despite the potential obstacles, it’s clear that remote work can be beneficial to both employees and employers in most areas of business and industries. While many of the current practices that are the result of the 2020 pandemic are likely temporary, remote work is likely only going to grow and is here to stay.

Click the link to view the recent blog: Leading with Purpose: Management’s Role in Acclimating New Employees or check back for more on human resources, payroll, insurance, and benefits.

Leading with Purpose: Management’s Role in Acclimating New Employees

“In teaching others, we teach ourselves.”

Employees are willing to listen to senior leaders and commit to and strive for business success. Organizations have a unique opportunity to reach out and engage all employees more fully in driving business results. Those that promote meaningful and systemic dialogue with their employees create a partnership for success.

According to a Gallup study a typical company employee engagement starts high and declines with tenure. However, throughout the employee relationship, there are engageable moments (onboarding and training, performance feedback, career discussions, etc.). Handling these moments well can help stop the decline.

It is not enough to communicate information about the Company to employees. It also matters who shares it. Employees, both current and new, want to hear from senior management. They want to hear about what is happening with the Company without being filtered through several management layers.

A senior manager who speaks openly and honestly about the organization increases the comfort level of employees. It’s essential to build credibility with employees, and with credibility comes trust. Trust is what moves the Company forward. This level of communication encourages mid-management to understand their role better.

The reality is that people care less about working for a company and much more about working for a compelling cause. Without purpose, employees are just putting in the time. A team without a goal is a team without passion. There might be short term results, but the employee will not have the heart to go the distance. Management must satisfy this basic need to give employees a compelling purpose.

This can be done by asking employees how their jobs relate to the team’s purpose. The following are some questions a manager might ask:

  1. How does our goal make you feel? (if we hear responses like proud, meaningful, connected, helpful, then we are on the right track)
  2. Does our purpose make you look at your job differently?
  3. Do our roles, procedures, resources, skills, and priorities support our ability to achieve our goal?
  4. What can you change or do differently to better support our goal?
  5. What can I change or do differently to better support our purpose?

Once employees see a clear connection between their role and their purpose, the next strategy is to help them stay focused on that purpose.

Click the link to view the recent blog: Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA) Mandate Ends 12/31/2020 or check back for more on human resources, payroll, insurance, and benefits.

Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA) Mandate Ends 12/31/2020

Under the recently signed Consolidated Appropriations Act, employers are no longer required to provide FFCRA leave after December 31, 2020. However, if employers choose to continue to provide paid leave under the terms of the FFCRA in 2021, they may continue to take the available tax credits through March 31, 2021.

We recommend that employers quickly but carefully determine how they are going to proceed in 2021, as there are several choices, such as:

  • End all leave under FFCRA effective December 31, 2020. If you choose this option, Inspiring HR encourages you to communicate to all employees, including those currently on leave, your decision to end the leave entitlement;
  • Continue to allow employees to use any unused, available FFCRA leave through March 31, 2021. Employees should only be entitled to any unused FFCRA leave they have remaining as of December 31, 2020;
  • Only continue Emergency Paid Sick Leave through March 31, 2021, allowing employees who contract or are exposed to the virus to stay home, but discontinue the entitlement to the much longer paid family leave for child care.

Employers who choose to end the leave entitlement are reminded that some employees may still be entitled to leave (paid or unpaid) under other laws such as the regular Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), state and local laws, or company policy.

Click the link to view the recent blog: Employees May Not Be So Holly Jolly This Year or check back for more on human resources, payroll, insurance, and benefits.

This notice does not constitute legal advice and there are subtle variations in employment law as it pertains to this topic, depending on where your business operates. It is strongly suggested that you seek HR consultation or legal counsel before making decisions about policies.