Time to Replace Outdated HR Policies

Out with the old, and in with the new!

How Respectful Workplace Policies are Replacing Antiquated Workplace Conduct Policies

Compliance with federal, state, and municipal workplace regulations is an unavoidable challenge of doing business, and the ways business owners choose to apply and communicate these mandatory policies continue to evolve.

It’s incumbent on business owners to adapt to current thinking wherever possible within their business model. Forward thinking not only protects the legal integrity of a workplace, but also can empower company culture to become your most effective retention and recruitment tool.

Reviewing Current Policies

Analyze your current polices and culture for the warning signs of outdated policies, such as:

  • A focus on results at any cost
  • Policies written in black and white, with no room for flexibility
    Rules for the sake of having rules
  • The policies reflect a business culture that is dangerously out of step with current thinking and best practices. They are based on the belief that employees must be controlled.

The Difference is in the Details

Title VII compliance requires a workplace where employees are treated with respect and dignity, but Workplace Conduct and Respectful Treatment policies try to attain that goal with different methods.

Workplace Conduct policies focus on what employees shouldn’t do.

  • Don’t use threatening or demeaning language
  • Don’t use racial, ethnic, or gender slurs
  • Don’t make actual or threaten physical conduct
  • Don’t spread rumor or gossip
  • Anti-Harassment (“Don’t harass!”) and Discrimination (“Don’t discriminate!”) policies are the most common examples of Workplace Conduct policies and their focus on controlling and banning behavior.

Respectful Treatment policies, on the other hand, are designed to educate, protect, and motivate. These policies move far beyond the Anti-Harassment and Discrimination policies that preceded them, because they promote an overall company culture of fairness, teamwork, and respect.

Respectful Treatment policies require that employees:

  • Treat all co-workers with respect, civility, and courtesy
  • Engage openly and collaboratively with co-workers, recognizing and embracing individual differences
  • Abide by rules, regulations, and policies; address inter-personal issues through appropriate channels
  • Commit to a culture where colleagues cooperate to achieve best possible business outcomes

We’re Not ‘All The Same’

There was a time when treating all employees exactly the same was considered Management 101, the ultimate way to protect a company from claims of discrimination or mistreatment. This management philosophy was, essentially, the genesis of inflexible Workplace Conduct policies.

But it’s now understood that Equal Treatment is not always Fair Treatment, as demonstrated by federal and state court rulings throughout the country. Every human being in your workplace is unique, facing his or her unique set of challenges and circumstances.

Small businesses can no longer find safety in black and white thinking.

A Respect Revolution

Respectful Treatment policies do more than just comply with federal and state workplace regulations. They also create and enforce a type of company culture that’s been shown to engaged the employee population – something that’s great for business, because an engaged employee is a productive one.

When updating your internal policies:

  • Create job descriptions that are up-to-date and clearly tied to performance goals. Show employees how they can succeed and how that success is tied to Respectful Treatment, teamwork, and overall company goals.
    Educate employees on how our differences enrich the workplace and make life interesting.
    Lead by example. Treating co-workers with respect is not an effective policy unless it’s also engrained as a way of doing business.
  • Metrics matter, but not more than an employee’s overall contributions to the team or the company. If you reward employees who bully their way to the top or demean their co-workers, these are exactly the behaviors you will encourage…and then you’ll be left to deal with the potential legal fallout.
  • Pay fairly. Below-market salaries and/or pay discrepancies within teams – ones that cannot be understood by differences in contributions – will chip away at feelings of being valued and respected.
    Consider adding flexibility where possible for the type of industry you work within. Does everyone have to report to work at 8 a.m.? Perhaps add some flexibility to accommodate personal obligations, medical conditions, and even basic traffic hassles as a way to modernize and humanize internal policies.

Workplace Conduct policies are becoming a product of the past. Instead, small businesses must embrace the transition to Respectful Treatment policies, to both legally protect their business and to protect the rights and well-being of their employees.

Click the link to view the recent INFINITI HR blog: The Rise of PEOs for Small Businesses or check back for more on human resources, payroll, insurance and benefits.

 

 

The Rise of PEOs for Small Businesses

Small businesses with lean management structures often struggle with the cost containment, administration, and time management of business practices.  Daily obstacles include managing insurance and liability policies, unemployment claims, payroll processing, tax filings, and general human resources processes such as staffing and performance management.

Take for instance the situation of Elite Cleaning Service (ECS) of Philadelphia, PA. ECS started out of Joe’s basement with his wife, three sister in-law’s and brother.  Within 6 months, he grew out of the basement and started renting office space.   After some additional business and staff growth, he secured a significant contract with a major bank requiring he hire 10 more people, fast.

Reality set in that he needed help.  In addition to assistance with hiring, he needed job descriptions, workplace rules, leadership training, formalized payroll processing and direct deposit options, some affordable but competitive benefits, wage and hour training, and his worker’s compensation claims and policy renewals were coming to a head.

He did not have the resources to employ dedicated administrative staff to handle the logistics of personnel and business administration; he needed to free up his own time to focus on strategic matters and sales; and, ECS was growing large enough for Joe to feel the increased pressure of his businesses’ liability and risks.

Joe’s headaches are common for growing small businesses, but he found the solution in an increasingly popular relationship: He elected to partner with Professional Employer Organization.

Professional Employment Organizations (PEOs) provide a one stop solution for outsourcing resources and increased purchasing power.  They may have started with simple payroll processing, but PEOs now provide a wider scope of services for some 180,000 small and mid-size companies across the U.S.

How The PEO Relationship Works

The PEO relationship is that of co-employment, with the PEO taking on the role of “employer of record”.  The small business is still an employer, however, and maintains a span of control over its staff, able to make day to day decisions on new hires, promotions, compensation programs, internal procedures, job duties, disciplinary actions, terminations. etc.

The PEO Advantage

Increasingly, franchises seeking brand uniformity for business and policy administration sans their own co-employment conflicts, are discovering and partnering with PEOs.  A PEO offers HR Business Consultants who can work with various franchisees in multiple states to provide an “instant HR infrastructure”, able to craft polices and culture behind the scenes that can be delivered independently by franchise owners to their staff.   This avoids the inconsistencies that evolve when individual franchisees attempt to start from scratch, allocating personnel or HR responsibilities to in-house staff with varying degrees of skill and knowledge and without the benefit of interacting with other franchise locations to build a consistent image.

That same “Instant HR” concept is especially appealing to businesses that are just getting started.  Before the organization has even started staffed the first employee, resources such as handbooks, time and attendance policies, pay policies, and internal employment practices can be ironed out, or are very quickly available, as new needs or questions present themselves during the business’s growth. An added feature, usually only affordable for larger businesses, is access to senior HR professionals equipped to expertly coach leadership on topics ranging from organizational development; performance management; handling difficult conversations; or guidance while facing internal complaints and associated investigations.

Mindy Flanigan, CIO and Owner of HR consulting firm Inspiring HR, assesses the monetary value for the time spent on basic HR Consulting services inclusive in her company’s PEO partnership to be $1,500 to $2,000 out of the gate to a new client needing a handbook and basic forms.  The return in investment grows exponentially if the client leverages the HR Consultants for wage and hour compliance coaching, performance management, and employer relations problem solving to mitigate legal entanglements.

An important area of operational alignment: Small business owners value simplicity and its impact on time management.  PEO payroll administration delivers on this concept as it allows one simple payment by the business per payroll cycle so that payroll is accurate, on-time, and covers all liability.

According to Daniel Mormino, senior vice president, at PEO INFINITI HR, “we shield each owner from employer related liability, ensuring the employer does not focus additional time or resources on non-revenue generating work”.  This is accomplished by providing teams dedicated to loss-control services such as business insurance, often taking on the lion’s share of the deductible and liability for claims or charges.  Additional support may include claims management of Unemployment and Safety cases, and managing work place incident reporting – all designed to minimize cost.  As part of risk management, the business can also look to the PEO to provide guidance on safety policies and the creation of safety manuals.

Through the shared pool of employees across its client base, PEOs have greater negotiation power, which allow small businesses greater access to benefits at a lower cost.  The complexity of benefits administration is reduced by access to one point of contact versus multiple providers when there are questions. Small businesses see the return on investment yet again, by having a competitive and affordable benefits package to attract new hires and retain current workers.

Looking Ahead

The bundled PEO resources are very appealing for any small business wanting to avoid the hassle of multiple vendors with inconsistent messages, and the efficiency can translate into improved business survival.

In September of 2016 a report by McBassi & Company and The National Association of Professional Employer Organizations examining a 2014 comparison between businesses using PEOs compared to national data available from the Bureau of Labor Statistics stated, “the employee turnover rate for PEO clients was 10 to 14 percentage points lower per year than it was for comparable companies in the U.S. overall: 28 to 32 percent annual employee turnover for companies that used PEOs for at least four quarters, compared to approximately 42 percent for all companies.”  In addition, they found that “businesses that used PEOs for at least four quarters are approximately 50 percent less likely to permanently go out of business from one year to the next when compared to the overall rate for similar private businesses in the United States.”

A realization this uncovers in the HR realm is that there has been a parallel maturing of the HR Profession and the PEO industry for over 20+ years.  PEOs once believed that outsourcing HR largely meant asking the Payroll Specialist some wage and hour questions while HR was regarded as the “personnel” paperwork pushers.  Neither sit in those spaces any longer.  HR’s reputation of adding value to any size business continues to improve; thus more businesses are interested in HR support.  As PEO’s compete for clients, the overall HR Consulting experience that can be delivered directly affects their sales and client retention efforts.  Thriving PEOs now understand that a comprehensive and quality client service experience must include dedicated access to experienced HR Consultants who can personalize service & support per client.

Click the link to view the recent INFINITI HR blog: Responsible Alcohol Use Policies at Work or check back for more on human resources, payroll, insurance and benefits.

Responsible Alcohol Use Policies at Work

“CAN I GET YOU A DRINK BEFORE WE GET STARTED?”

Do you remember watching television shows from the 1960’s and 1970’s where business professionals were regularly seen taking a shot of vodka or slowly sipping on a glass of scotch as they prepared for a very important meeting? Back in the day, many employers permitted employees to drink while at work and sometimes even encouraged drinking during meetings.

Through the years, more and more federal and state employment laws started evolving and drinking on the job became a liability to business owners. Also, employers who held general liability insurance coverage and workers’ compensation were finding that accidents and/or injuries that were a result from an employee being intoxicated on the job, were not always covered under their policies.  Therefore, business owners started adopting strict policies prohibiting drinking alcohol while at work to avoid any unnecessary liabilities.

Is it a good idea to develop a company policy allowing employees to casually drink while working?

In the day and age of millennials, allowing employees to drink while at work has circled back around and is becoming a popular trend among many businesses. There are many businesses serving alcohol in common areas and/or break rooms – a keg in the cafeteria, wine cooler in the break room, or even a bar in the lobby. So, what has changed? Employers still have the same liabilities with employees drinking on the job as they did back in the 1960’s. Why has this become a popular trend again?  Should all employers consider adopting a casual “day drinking” policy? Let’s take a look at the pros and cons of having a responsible alcohol use policy and discuss the details needed for its success.

Responsible Alcohol Use on the Job – Pros and Cons

Having a responsible alcohol use policy and allowing employees to consume while at work may be beneficial to a business. However, there are also many risks associated to drinking on the job. Business owners must thoroughly review the pros and cons of drinking on the job to determine if introducing a formal alcohol consumption policy is right for the business.

Certainly! Here’s a refreshed and refined list of the pros and cons of allowing alcohol consumption in the workplace:

Pros of Responsible Alcohol Use in the Workplace:

  • Stress and Anxiety Reduction: Offers a relaxation benefit for some employees, easing work-related stress and anxiety.
  • Boosts Creativity: Can lead to enhanced creative thinking, fostering innovative solutions.
  • Openness to New Ideas: Encourages a more open-minded approach to changes and new concepts.
  • Enhanced Teamwork: Promotes social interactions that can strengthen team bonds and collaboration.
  • Increased Job Satisfaction: Leads to a happier workforce, reducing employee turnover.
  • Extended Work Hours: Employees might be more inclined to stay later to complete projects in a more relaxed environment.
  • Product Knowledge: For those in the beverage industry, it increases product understanding and appreciation.
  • Viewed as a Perk: Seen as a valuable employee benefit, contributing to overall job satisfaction.
  • Promotes Carpooling: May encourage more employees to carpool to work, knowing they can socialize afterwards.

Cons of Allowing Alcohol at Work:

  • Potential for Aggression: Can heighten emotions, leading to anger or aggressive behaviors in some.
  • Compromised Decision-Making: Impairs judgement, potentially affecting work quality and safety.
  • Safety Risks: Raises the likelihood of workplace accidents and injuries.
  • Harassment Concerns: Could lead to an increase in harassment claims, including sexual harassment.
  • Professionalism Issues: May result in unprofessional behavior or comments.
  • Exclusionary Atmosphere: Risks alienating employees who abstain from alcohol, possibly affecting morale.
  • Risk of Substance Abuse: Might enable or worsen alcohol abuse problems, affecting employee health.
  • Legal Issues with Minors: Possibility of underage employees accessing alcohol.
  • Diminished Work Quality: Risk of reduced work performance and lower output quality.
  • After-Hours Liability: Increases the company’s liability for incidents involving employees post-consumption.
  • Risk of Excessive Consumption: Opens the door to binge drinking and its associated problems.

There will always be risk involved when permitting alcohol at work. However, do the pros outweigh the cons? When is it right to have a responsible alcohol use policy?  Obviously, not all professions (factory, transportation, health care, safety officials, education, etc.) should be allowed to drink on the job for safety reasons.

Things to Consider Before Implementing a Responsible Alcohol Use policy.

As I mentioned above, business owners need to consider if a responsible alcohol use policy will work for their business – outlining and reviewing the pros and cons to permitting alcohol is the first step. The next step is to determine the following:

  1. Does the policy align with the core values and mission statement of the business?
  2. Does the general liability insurance and workers’ compensation cover claims as a result of an employee(s) drinking at work?
  3. Do you have a post-accident, post-injury, or probable cause drug & alcohol testing policy that conflicts with, or complements, your responsible alcohol use policy? How will the two policies interact?
  4. Do you need a license to service alcohol on the premises?
  5. How will you handle intoxicated employees?
  6. Will you provide company paid transportation for intoxicated employees?
  7. How will you limit and track the amount of drinks an employee can consume?
  8. When is it acceptable for employees to drink while at work? Only on Fridays, any day after 4:00 PM, or during a weekly recap meeting?
  9. Will you provide alternatives to employees who don’t drink?
  10. Where will alcohol be available and/or served, and where can employees drink? At their desks, in the break room, in the board room, etc.?
  11. How will you handle complaints, inappropriate behavior, and/or violations of the policy?
  12. Will you have an employee assistance program (EAP) available to employees who may have or may develop an alcohol addiction or problem?

As you can see from the list above, there are so many factors to consider before deciding if alcohol on the job is right for your business. While drinking on the job may sound like a great idea and could increase employee morale, there are many risks associated with the distribution of alcohol at work, which may cause a huge liability to the business.

Other relevant FAQs around this topic:

Q: How can businesses effectively monitor and enforce moderation in alcohol consumption to minimize risks?

A: Monitoring and enforcing moderation in alcohol consumption requires a blend of clear guidelines, cultural reinforcement, and technological or procedural controls. Businesses might consider implementing a digital tracking system for drinks, akin to a token or voucher system, where employees are allotted a certain number of drinks per event or time period. Additionally, fostering an organizational culture that emphasizes responsible drinking as part of professional behavior can help enforce moderation. Regular training sessions on the effects of alcohol and the importance of moderation, coupled with visible leadership support for these policies, will further reinforce the company’s commitment to a safe and inclusive workplace.

Q: In what ways can companies support employees who choose not to drink or are in recovery from alcoholism while still maintaining a responsible alcohol use policy?

A: Companies can support non-drinking employees and those in recovery by ensuring that alcohol-free environments are equally appealing and that non-alcoholic beverage options are always available and promoted at company events. Hosting alcohol-free events or social activities can also demonstrate inclusivity. Moreover, making employee assistance programs (EAPs) readily available, providing resources for counseling or support groups, and having a clear policy on offering support without judgment or discrimination are essential steps. Encouraging an open dialogue about the importance of respecting personal choices regarding alcohol can foster a more inclusive company culture.

Q: How do international laws and cultural differences impact the implementation of a responsible alcohol use policy for global companies?

A: International laws and cultural differences pose unique challenges for global companies looking to implement a responsible alcohol use policy. It’s crucial for these companies to conduct thorough legal research and consult with local HR experts to ensure compliance with the diverse legal landscapes related to alcohol consumption in the workplace. Additionally, understanding and respecting cultural attitudes towards alcohol is vital. Customizing policies to reflect local norms and expectations, while also maintaining core aspects of the company’s responsible use policy, can help bridge these differences. Communication and education about the policy should be tailored to consider cultural sensitivities and legal requirements, ensuring all employees feel respected and included.

If you’re drinking at work, you should always drink responsibly.

Click the link to view the recent INFINITI HR blog: Employee Travel – Do I Pay For That? or check back for more on human resources, payroll, insurance and benefits.

 

Employee Travel – Do I Pay For That?

When business as usual involves reporting to the same location every day, employee travel isn’t a subject that may come up very often.  When it does, whether it is a short trip a mile away or overnight travel, it raises questions.

What exactly is an employer required to pay for? What about travel time for hourly employees?

Sending your employees anywhere offsite, no matter the distance or time spent, will incur expenses. In terms of tangible items purchased, or paid services, if you do not provide a corporate credit card, these will be out-of-pocket for your employees who travel. While some of these expenses may be tax-deductible for employees if their employers do not reimburse them, there are many limitations to what they can actually deduct at tax time. Keep in mind that some states, like California, require that companies reimburse all out-of-pocket expenses incurred while doing business (with reasonable limits) offsite. If employees are traveling on behalf of your company, a best practice is to simply reimburse them for what they have spent while doing so.

Some examples of common travel expenses are:

  • Airline and train tickets (including change fees if company plans prompt a change to travel plans), baggage fees, and tips up to a certain percentage
  • Car rental fees (if your company requires your employees to purchase the rental insurance, this is also a reimbursable expense) and gas
  • Taxi or bus/shuttle fares
  • Parking fees
  • Hotel accommodations and wi-fi charges
  • Dry cleaning expenses for trips of a certain length
  • Meals
  • Mileage (if employee’s personal car is used)
  • It is recommended that mileage be reimbursed at the standard IRS rate (54.5 cents a mile for 2018) or, if a company desires to do so, at actual cost

An accountable travel expense policy where employees submit actual expenses for reimbursement versus a flat “travel stipend” amount is recommended to avoid your employees having additional income added to their W2s.

What if employees spend money during their off time? Are there any expenses I am not required to reimburse?

There are limits. There is no law that requires you to pay for spa treatments, concert tickets, extravagant meals or other expenditures that occur during downtime on a business trip. A comprehensive Business Travel Policy will assist your employees’ understanding about what is and is not reimbursable. Non-reimbursable expenses may include:

  • Upgrades to flight seating or charges for in-flight entertainment systems
  • Travel change fees if not due to business reasons
  • Parking tickets or tickets for moving violations
  • Meal costs over a reasonable limit
    • Employers should consider geographic location cost differences when determining what a reasonable limit may be. Dinner out in large cities, for example, will likely be more expensive as a rule than it would be in other parts of the country.
  • Charges for alcohol
  • General sightseeing and shopping expenses
    • If an airline loses an employee’s luggage, you may want to consider reimbursing for reasonable replacement of clothing and toiletries purchased for purposes of completing the business trip
  • Room upgrades, in-room movie rentals and honor bar charges
  • Room service if not one of the standard daily meals. (The cost of ordering a pizza via room service three hours after dinner may not be reimbursable unless required work projects dictate a later night)
  • Charges for treatments in hotel spas or fitness classes
    • If the hotel where the employee is staying has required “resort fees” that are automatically added to the bill, these should, as a rule, be part of what is reimbursed

Business travel policies should not only outline what is, and is not, reimbursable and how to submit expenses. If the company has a preferred hotel group, airline or travel agency that should be used, this information should also be included in a travel policy, as well as any documentation/explanation required for going outside of the preferred vendors. If there are different tiers of travel expenses allowed based on title and/or job level (i.e. executives may fly first class for long trips) these details should be listed in the policy as well and applied consistently.

As another best practice: Submitted expenses should have a quick turnaround for approvals and processing and be reimbursed in a reasonable amount of time.

What about pay for travel time for hourly employees?

Non-exempt employee travel is tricky as the wage rules vary by state.

From a Department of Labor (Federal) standpoint, compensable hours for non-exempt employees while traveling as a passenger (in a plane, bus, train, car, boat) are generally only those that fall during regular work hours.  If the employee, on the other hand, is required to do the driving, this would be considered compensable time.

In California, however, all travel time (whether the employee is a passenger or active driver) is compensable less an employee’s regular commute time. Please note that actual in-the-air or on-the-road travel time can be paid at state or local minimum wage unless actual work is being performed during that time (i.e. an employee answers emails and/or works on a presentation while on a flight.)

Any meetings or required activities outside of work hours are generally considered compensable – state and federally – at local overtime rates.

Important to note: Even while offsite, any state or federal meal/ rest period and overtime rules still apply and non-exempt employees should carefully track their time while traveling.  If employees travel out of state, check wage and hour laws for days spent at that location. More than likely those are the laws that should be followed.

As for shorter day trips – regular commuting, errands, travel to a local conference, it comes down to employer control and state law.

  • If George, an hourly employee is asked to stop and pick up supplies or refreshments on the way in to work, George may be owed for all or part of that time.
  • If you require hourly employees to take a company-provided shuttle to work, that time spent in the shuttle may be considered work time.
  • If Jenny reports to her regular work location in the morning and leaves for a conference at 10 a.m., finishes the conference at 2 p.m. and returns to work, the time spent traveling to and from the conference may be compensable in all states as it occurs during work hours. Alternatively, If she leaves the conference at 5 p.m. and goes straight home, if the time it takes for Jenny to get home is longer than her usual commute you may owe travel time for the difference.
    • This works similarly if employees need to travel to multiple clients or locations throughout the day.

As travel is a sometimes necessary cost of doing business and remaining competitive in the market, developing a Business Travel Policy is essential to keep control of those costs and guide employees on how best to manage their travel plans and expenditures.

A close eye on wage and hour laws will also assist in ensuring your hourly employees who travel are paid appropriately as well.  The following sites provide additional guidance:  IRS & Mileage RatesCalifornia Travel Wage Requirements;  and Department of Labor Fact Sheet: Travel Pay.

Click the link to view the recent INFINITI HR blog: The Decline of Classroom Training or check back for more on human resources, payroll, insurance and benefits.

The Decline of Classroom Training

Retro isn’t always cool…

According to a 2016 survey of learning and development (L&D) professionals, 78% of training programs rely on in-person classroom training as the primary teaching strategy. And yet, in the same study, L&D professionals admit that getting employees to physically attend these trainings is a top challenge, second only to budget.

The webinar was born to address those training hurdles of time and money. It eliminates the expense of sending employees off-site to learn from a subject expert or bringing that expert on-site. Instructor fees, travel, and material costs vanish when an in-person expert is replaced by an expert on video. Additionally, time away from work is significantly reduced.

But even with the advent of the webinar, the delivery method changed while the actual training method remained constant – a classroom learning model that is non-participatory and lecture-based.

This means most trainings continue to follow a learning model that is, quite literally, old school.

“Organizations are still trying to reach today’s learners with yesterday’s tactics.” – Tanya Staples, Sr.  Director of Content and Production for LinkedIn Learning.

Picture an average school classroom of the last 10 or 15 years. Students aren’t being droned at by the economics teacher in Ferris Bueller’s Day Off. They’re using technology and project-based learning. They’re working collaboratively in groups. And many of those former students are in the workforce right now.

In the context of L&D, the most important change ushered in by millennials is simply the extent to which they value learning opportunities in general. Millennials lived through the economic uncertainty of the great recession. As a result, they want opportunities to grow their skills and stay marketable throughout their long careers.

In fact, in a 2016 Manpower survey of almost 2,000 millennials, 93% said they wanted life-long learning opportunities. And in Deliotte’s 2016 Millennial Survey, millennials revealed that they value career development opportunities over salary.

This is a real wake up call to companies planning to hire sometime in the next, well, 30 years. Essentially, any company that doesn’t provide on-going learning opportunities might lose out on 95 million potential employees, which can make it a little tough to stay competitive.

But as it turns out, millennials aren’t particularly interested in the teaching methods of their parents’ generation. So, what is it they’re looking for? And why?

Let’s make this quick, shall we?

Training that is interesting, convenient, focused, and engaged is the goal of millennial-friendly training and development.

Think of TED Talks. They’re capped at 18-minutes. Why? Because that’s long enough to be interesting and short enough to be convenient. The upper limit is purposefully low to keep the speaker focused and the audience engaged, two essential elements for effective learning.

For purposes of workplace learning, small and targeted segments of information mean that employees can learn something new while drinking their morning coffee and in short order are on the job, applying that very information to their work day. They can start the training at a point that matches their personal skill set, and not waste time reviewing information they already know. It’s a learning model that has tremendous appeal to employees and management.

It’s no surprise, then, that current and upcoming revelations to the L&D world provide training that is:

  1. Convenient – Video-based and accessible from mobile devices
  2. Instantaneous – Available 24/7
  3. Collaborative – Peer-to-peer, project-based
  4. Quick – Micro-learning/nano-learning modules; purposefully short teaching segments that, when put together, create an entire lesson on a specific topic
  5. Continuous – Short modules that connect to a larger whole, so employees can delve deeper into subjects that appeal to them and that are applicable to their career path

But, wait! There’s more.

Training doesn’t need technology

What’s really interesting about this modern workforce is that for all the slack they receive for being technology-obsessed, some of their most desired training methods actually don’t involve technology at all.

Remember that this generation experienced the benefits of collaborative, project-based work from a young age. As a result, they also place high value on learning opportunities that have absolutely nothing to do with a computer screen, such as:

  1. Mentoring – providing guidance and advice to someone less experienced
  2. Coaching – working with someone to attain a specific goal or result
  3. Cross-training – teaching one employee the skills necessary to perform two or more roles within a company
  4. Job-rotation – a formalization of the cross-training relationship, where an employee officially shifts between two or more defined roles at regular intervals

The purpose of employee trainings is to educate the workforce, but it’s time to break the stereotypical mold of what training “should be”. By understanding who your trainees are, what motivates them, and aligning these with your business goals, you can create the right mix of learning opportunities that recruit, train, engage, and retain your employees.

Click the link to view the recent INFINITI HR blog: Pre-Employment Show vs. Tell or check back for more on human resources, payroll, insurance and benefits.

Pre-Employment Show vs. Tell

Don’t tell them… show them:  Job Previews and other Assessment Options

Ever walk through an office space on the way to an interview and see the glistening hallways, large modern bouquets on the reception desk and hushed, state-of-the-art conference rooms? Someone brings in croissants and fruit on glass platters, asks if you want a cappuccino.  The interviewers are in dark suits, have slick business cards and gleaming attaché cases. Everyone is amiable but professional.  Smiles and handshakes abound.

“Wow,” you think.  “I would love to work here.”

It may be a bit of a letdown on your first day to be escorted past the beautiful reception area, past the sleek conference rooms and through a side door, into the area where the employees actually do their work. White and gray walls, printers and fax machines. People are yelling directions at co-workers down the hall, phones are ringing off the hook, and a very stressed-looking person in jeans comes at you with a stack of paper to fill out before dashing into a meeting where the door is closed and blinds are drawn.

Not quite what you expected.

While giving a good impression of your company is a high priority when someone is interviewing for a job with you, an interview really doesn’t create an accurate picture of what the workday will be like. It also doesn’t give you any idea of how your interviewee will fit in to the work environment as candidates are also usually showing you their best, most accommodating side of themselves to get the job.

So, how can employers reveal what’s behind the curtain in order to try to avoid some unpleasant surprises once a candidate becomes an employee?

Beyond a recruiting process that accurately represents your brand and culture, a job preview or trial period may do the trick.  Both are ways for candidates to see what a few hours on the job is really like as well as good methods for the company to use in assessing how the candidate may do in a job situation. To ensure that this “on-the-job” sneak-peek doesn’t put you afoul of labor laws or open you up for liability, here are a few things to keep in mind:

  1. Pre-hire, keep it preview-only. Whether the position the candidate is trying for is manning phones in a call center, entering data or cooking in a kitchen, it is important to note that during this “audition”, there should be no work done that benefits the company.  In other words, a candidate can’t take actual calls in a call center but can take several “fake” calls in a simulated environment to see how he or she handle different situations in real time. Data entry ability can be assessed in a test format if it’s not data that can later be used. Otherwise, you will probably owe wages for any time “worked” – before they are even hired.

Most realistic job previews consist solely of observation, with the company’s interviewer using the opportunity to gauge the candidate’s interaction and communication style with the people they meet and assess engagement: Did the candidate keep checking their phone during the observation period? What questions did they ask? When asked, what takeaways did the candidate seize? Was the candidate able to describe key points or priorities that should have been evident in their observation or discussions with others? Here’s your chance to confirm if they are paying attention to what matters to the organization.

  1. Keep the cooks out of the fully-operational kitchen… until you do your due diligence. Before doing a “trial run” or “preview” with a candidate for a kitchen or other role in a risk-filled environment (warehouse, garage, hospital), check with your Workers’ Compensation carrier and risk management team to assess any potential liability issues. Recreating the environment in a controlled way may be an option if the real thing poses too many problems.
  1. Go Temp before Perm. Hiring someone on a temporary basis is a great way to see how they pan out before making a permanent offer. It is important to set expectations up front. Once they pass the interview process, for example, you can extend a temporary offer for a designated period of time (less than 90 days is recommended) at a lower (but in most cases, not less than minimum) wage while you assess performance and fit. The benefit of this method is that you can ask these employees to do actual work once they are ready to roll. Be sure to stick to agreed-upon timeframes for hiring decisions and follow all applicable federal, state, and local labor laws.
  1. Let them listen in. Job-shadowing can be a great way that for candidates to experience the work environment in certain industries before signing an offer letter.  They could listen in on calls, walk the floor with employees, or attend part of a regularly-held meeting. Don’t forget that these job hopefuls may become privy to some privileged internal information in the process. Check with your legal resources to see if a non-disclosure agreement or liability release is necessary before making it a part of the pre-hire process.

And finally, be honest. Even if a job preview-type activity isn’t in the cards, it’s always important to be honest with candidates about the work environment and job they are interviewing for. Is it high energy? Low energy? What is the dress code? What are the “official” hours and what hours are expected? Is it a position that many have found challenging in the past? What about the candidate’s work history could help them be successful in the job where others have struggled?

I once interviewed for a position with the hiring manager, and while we were talking, the phone constantly rang, people popped in and out of her office every few minutes, and an intercom boomed frequent messages throughout the cavernous warehouse-style space. She described the job and shared with me, among other things, that while the hours in the office were fairly standard, frequent travel was expected with very little notice.  I appreciated both the interview location and specific details she shared as they gave me a very real taste of what the job would be like daily and while it wasn’t for me, another candidate may have found the organized chaos and spontaneous travel exhilarating.

Fit – a combination of the right experience and personalities coming together – is one of the most important factors in a long-term employment relationship. Whatever employers can do to assess this ahead of time – and help candidates assess their interest themselves – can save time and money in the long run.

Click the link to view the recent INFINITI HR blog: Rethinking Multitasking or check back for more on human resources, payroll, insurance and benefits.

 

Rethinking Multitasking

Less Multi-Tasking… More Effectiveness

So, you’re hiring and seeing a slew of resumes from candidates who claim to be experts at multi-tasking. In interviews, they profess a great love of jumping from project to project, call to call, and back to the first project again, all while keeping everything straight and finishing every task in record time.

But… does effective multi-tasking really exist?

Do you need to rethink that “ability to multitask” off the job descriptions as a requirement?

Increasingly, we are seeing more information tell us that, for the majority of the population, multi-tasking may actually be bad for your brain (some articles and studies cited below). A many-tasked brain is a distracted one. While many people think they are excellent multitaskers, the amount of car accidents caused by texting and driving as well as potentially embarrassing occurrences of “reply all” emails that should have been directed to one person may prove otherwise.

I remember taking a commuter bus in downtown Los Angeles a few years ago and while looking down at the traffic below I caught sight of a young man in his car.  He was attempting to drive while talking on his phone and trying to eat a steak dinner (with a steak knife) off of a plate he had balanced on his center console.  I can only imagine how that ended for him.  Best case scenario: he may have ended up with mashed potatoes on his tie.  The bottom line is that he was trying to do three things at once and all of them probably poorly.

While the ability to manage priorities is a necessity, somewhere along the line an idea formed that everything had to happen at the same time. Some ways to help your employees avoid a multi-task meltdown?

Set Expectations from the Top Down. 

  • Discourage the “Instant Response” While you’ve never given a formal mandate that employees answer work calls or emails while on the road, there may be an impression out there that being available 24-7 is the key to success at your company. Proactively coach your team to be fully present at each meeting and on each task, then, if you see that someone is responding to your emails when you know he or she is on the road to or from work, or at midnight, a quick conversation with your employee to put his or her mind at ease might do the trick. And along those lines…
  • Try not to send emails marked “Urgent!”. While email is a quick way to communicate and get questions answered, it is also an amazing form of distraction.  I’ve had someone send me an email and fifteen minutes later call me to ask if I’ve received it, because it was an urgent matter.  Consider that someone may not be answering an email because they are deep into a project that you’ve assigned.  If something is truly urgent, it is probably better to pick up the phone or stop by.
  • Meetings, meetings, and more meetings: Ever have one of those days when you went to meeting after meeting which left you confused by conflicting priorities and, by the way, left you no time to actually get any work done? Try to model good anti-multitasking behavior by not scheduling impromptu meetings that would interrupt the flow of the workday. Remember, once employees have to drop what they are doing to refocus their attention on something else, it may be hard to get back into the groove again. Regularly scheduled meetings can take their toll, too.  It may be a good idea to evaluate the importance and frequency of all meetings from time to time to see if they can be paired down or eliminated if they are no longer useful.
  • Keep an Eye on “Hot Priority” Overload. Managing priorities is the opposite of setting all priorities to #1.  If all projects on someone’s list are labeled “Hot! Do first!” then none of them will be first… or considered any more important than the rest.  Encourage employees to come to you if they get conflicting information on where their projects should fall on the importance scale and assist with any roadblocks they are coming across that impede their process.
  • Avoid Changing Priorities Mid-Stream… too often. It does happen: agreed-upon priorities have been set and then one thing occurs that causes everything else to change course.  If it happens too frequently, though, you will have employees who are frustrated and scattered and feeling like they’ll never see anything to completion.  If there is a manager who seems to love to do this, try to work with him or her to see what can still be salvaged to give hard-working employees a sense of constancy.

And finally…

  • Encourage Single-Tasking Whenever Possible. If you happen to catch employees trying to catch up on emails during a meeting, or trying to take a work call while eating lunch and reviewing a presentation printout at the same time, try to do what you can to gently nudge them away from distraction mode.  If a manager gives employees permission to focus on one thing at a time – and to do that one thing well – they might actually do it.

Click the link to view the recent INFINITI HR blog: What Not to Do When Dealing with Harassment Complaints or check back for more on human resources, payroll, insurance and benefits.

Additional Resources on the Topic:

“Why Single-Tasking Makes You Smarter” by Sandra Bond Chapman, PhD

“The Myth of Multitasking” by Nancy K. Napier, PhD

“The Limits of Multitasking” by Kevin Rafferty

What Not to Do When Dealing with Harassment Complaints

Exposing misconduct is in the air. So we ask employers: what kind of environment have you been cultivating?

The recent explosion of accusations and charges of sexual misconduct has put the nation’s employers on alert. If you don’t have a policy and procedures on dealing with sexual harassment, or its bigger category, harassment, in place, you better get them – fast.

If you google “harassment policies” you’ll see the uptick of blogs and discussions on what to do. What you don’t often hear, however, is what you were doing wrong, i.e., what not to do.

What companies often do wrong in dealing with any type of harassment:

Not training your managers to spot and act on red flags proactively. While this might seem obvious on paper, I have discovered any number of managers looking the other way because they feel the absence of an active complaint means that no one is being negatively affected.  This can be the overly sexual calendar in the warehouse office, the casual shoulder rub in the break room, the locker room jokes in the executive conference room, playful flirting with direct reports, the racist joke, or tolerating inappropriate comments or language from a customer or business vendor because “they are the client”.  The assumption is that it is all in good fun and not “unwanted” by the group involved, so unless a complaint is on the table, it must be okay.

The danger here is that by not driving change to stop these behaviors, two things are happening:

1 – You’re inadvertently enabling a culture that tolerates and supports harassment in the workplace; and,

2 – The fact that your supervisors or managers are aware but not acting is putting your organization at additional risk for purposely neglecting the problem.

The magnitude of this problem might not be appreciated until an employee files a charge with the EEOC or hires an attorney and the investigator brings all these past behaviors to light. At that point, it is too late to fix, and the financial ramifications will be huge.

Not taking a complaint seriously. You may be thinking, “I’d never not take it seriously!”, but, you may have not realized you were hearing a complaint.  There seems to be a poor assumption out there that for it to be a complaint, the employee must march over to HR or will start a conversation with “I would like to place a formal complaint”, but that isn’t what normally happens.  More often than not, the problem is in the beginning or middle stages, where the employee feels uncomfortable but is afraid to say anything or does not want a huge fuss, so they say it to bring it to your attention but don’t emphasize it, and back down if you don’t seem receptive.

For example, during a weekly sales update where you are asking how a new client is doing, the representative might say, “Things are going well, he likes our products, and is increasing his order next week, but the guy is kind of creepy.  He tends to be handsy with the female vendors.” If your response is, “Great job on increasing the order! Don’t let him bother you too much, he’s harmless”, you most likely just heard a complaint, blew it off, and defended the client’s behavior. Upon hearing your defense of him, this employee will be less likely to feel safe continuing the conversation to reveal something specific that may have occurred that is bothering them, or a desire to seek your help with the matter.  The better response would have been along the lines of “That is not acceptable. Do you need my help dealing with this, or is there anything else we need to know about his behavior?” or, more directly, “Do you need to place a complaint?” to drill deeper into what you are hearing.  If it is a complaint, deal with it appropriately and involve an HR rep.  If the response is “I’m fine, it’s just an observation, for now”, you should always encourage and support the employee that you are there to help, and you should give HR a heads-up.  It also does not hurt to remind your staff that “the first and best way to handle a minor annoyance before it festers is to stand up for yourself and state to the offender that a specific behavior is not okay with you and needs to stop, and if that doesn’t work or you’re not comfortable doing that, the company needs to know so that we can help”.

Not having a documented and clear communication process while handling a complaint. It is ALWAYS a good idea to produce an “acknowledgement of receipt” letter to the person placing a complaint immediately or at least within 24 hours. It should also provide verification that you will be conducting an investigation and communicating a goal for completion of said investigation, typically about 10 business days. Realistically, the faster you can wrap it up the better, but to give yourself some time to do it right is important up front.

Why does this matter? After placing a complaint, the employee is anxious. If they have been told, “We’ll get back to you” without a timeline, they might assume nothing is being done after a week of silence.  This leads to poor reactive behaviors such as telling other employees the company doesn’t care, it might impact their productivity, or generate the feeling that they need to escalate the matter to an outside party to be taken seriously. Not having a similar notice to the person who the complaint is directed at is also a miss.  They deserve the courtesy of seeing the issue and the process in writing and have the same benefits of a time line, so they know what to expect. Having a comment misunderstood or feeling wrongly accused is a painful experience, and an employee who wasn’t expecting a complaint can exhibit the same negative reactive behaviors with colleagues or outside agencies if they don’t feel you are handling the matter professionally or thoroughly. When all is said and done, if you don’t also produce letters to the involved parties on the completion of the investigation and how they are each affected, you are missing out on a chance to clearly communicate for their peace of mind and to document to minimize risk.

Not having or not enforcing a no-retaliation policy. This is a horrible mistake. It’s one thing to put out the expectation of no-harassment, it is another to ensure employees feel safe using it. If you don’t have the safe-guard of no-retaliation, employees won’t step forward until issues are unmanageable.

It’s an HR practitioner’s wish that employees would always step up when issues are so minor that no-one needs to lose their job. Instead, the issue is addressed, no one was hurt, the bad behavior stops, everybody learns something, and employees return to their respective roles.  That won’t happen if employees feel that sounding the alarm causes more problems than it solves. Whether it is because it drives change that other employees resent and they isolate or harass the complainer, or because the employee feels their career will be negatively affected by management because they went against status-quo.

The ramifications of retaliating need to have as much, or more, impact than violating any other policy. I once fired a manager not because he said something inappropriate to a pregnant employee, but rather because after he was counseled and coached on the matter he stormed over and complained to her that she complained.  She never wanted him to lose his job, but he was not professional enough to learn from the situation and stop hostile behaviors.  That is not something the company needed in its management team.  The resulting credibility that management gained from employees for a willingness to address problems and make hard decisions went a long way.  It also set an example for others who needed to improve on how they handled constructive feedback meant to better the workplace.

Looking ahead

If you look deep inside your organization, you can almost always find something that is being done wrong.  While you don’t know what you don’t know, you can put safeguards in place to prevent behaviors you don’t want. When you sit down to develop or update your harassment policies, stop and think about the loopholes discussed above and ask yourself if you can rely on your managers to respond appropriately.  If the answer isn’t a resounding “Yes,” this should be where you focus additional training and support to bring your policies to life.

Click the link to view the recent INFINITI HR blog: Offer Letters, Not Employment Contracts or check back for more on human resources, payroll, insurance and benefits.

Offer Letters, Not Employment Contracts

“Offer Letters ” vs.“Employment Contracts” and knowing the difference.

When hiring a new employee, the goal is to find a great performer who will also follow your established policies and procedures, be able to get along with his or her co-workers, and will be loyal to your company. Once you do find that perfect candidate, an offer will be extended, usually in the form of a letter.  Once the letter is signed, the whole orientation process can begin.  What, however, will the employee be signing?  And, what should it be called?

Is it an employment contract or an offer letter?  And does it really matter what it’s called?

In the event that the business relationship does not work out, the last thing you want to do is bind yourself legally to the employee because of wording in an offer letter.  The important thing to remember about most offer letters is they are basic agreements to terms and not actual contracts.  They outline the details of the offer for the future employee if he or she agrees to come work with you, such as the following items:

  • Title of position
  • Who the position reports to
  • Hourly and/or annualized pay
  • Any discretionary or non-discretionary bonus plans
  • Whether the position is full or part time, exempt or non-exempt
  • General expectations of schedule to be worked
  • If benefits are offered
  • PTO/vacation/sick pay plans
  • If the offer is contingent on a background check or drug screening
  • That the offer is contingent on being able to present documents as part of the I-9 process and sign other required documents or agreements
  • If employment is “at-will”

The future employee, by signing the letter, is simply agreeing to the terms.  In offer letters of this type, there is no guarantee of continued employment or bonuses and no clauses or guaranteed action if and when employment ends.

CALLING AN OFFER LETTER A “CONTRACT” IMPLIES THAT SOMETHING – EMPLOYMENT TERMS OR PAY – IS GUARANTEED AND LEGALLY BINDING.

Please keep in mind that some offer letters for upper level management may actually be contracts, which, again, are documents that are enforceable under the law. There may be legal verbiage built into the letter discussing guaranteed parachute payments, bonuses or stock options, as well as treatment of proprietary information and other items.  These types of offers are usually drafted by attorneys.  Any breach of these contracts by either party could lead to legal action.

How can you tell if your standard offer letter is venturing into contract territory?

  • Guarantees – are there any promises by the company of hours or specific bonus or payment amounts regardless of performance?
  • “By accepting this offer, I agree to” – Is there language within the offer letter that implies that candidates are “agreeing” to do something (other than accept the offer) or waive any rights? Are there any promises that they will pay fees or waive their right to pursue legal action if and when the employment relationship ends?
  • Timeframes – is there a specified length of employment?
  • Non-compete language – is there wording around pursuing opportunities after termination?
  • Termination payments – are there any promised severance, bonus or other payments other than what is legally required under federal or state law?

It is recommended that any waivers and agreements that you want for your employee population-at-large (such as Confidentiality and Non-Disclosure, Non-Compete, Arbitration or Commission Agreements) be signed separately from offer letters and employee handbooks as they are legal documents.  Please note that Non-Compete or other agreements may vary by state in terms of enforceability so it is best to seek legal advice when seeking information on any additional documents that are signed once an employee officially joins your organization.

Put simply, offer letters state the terms of the offer, but are not guarantees of additional payments or continued employment and do not contain waivers or promissory language.  If terms look too specific or agreement-heavy, you may be looking at a contract that could put you in a legal bind if the employment relationship goes south.

Click the link to view the recent INFINITI HR blog: Medical Marijuana in the Workplace or check back for more on human resources, payroll, insurance and benefits.

 

Medical Marijuana in the Workplace

As of today, 30 states and the District of Columbia have passed some level of medical marijuana legislation, essentially allowing the regulated use of a narcotic that remains illegal under federal law. And most of these states offer no employment protections for use of the drug they’ve legalized.

This means medical marijuana simultaneously is and isn’t legal. And depending on the state, its regulated use simultaneously is and isn’t protected in the workplace.

ONE THING IS CERTAIN –  MEDICAL MARIJUANA IS A HEADACHE FOR EMPLOYERS.

Confusion at the Top

Federally, marijuana is a Schedule One drug under the Controlled Substance Act. This classification is reserved for drugs with a high potential for abuse and no accepted medical purpose.

However (as of July 2017), 23 states had legalized marijuana for medical use. It’s a startling disconnect between federal and state legislation. With a states’ rights President and a federalist Attorney General on opposing sides of the subject, an executive or federal solution seems unlikely.

A Prescription for… termination?

Marijuana can be an effective treatment for such conditions as: glaucoma, PTSD, Crohn’s Disease, epilepsy, and the chronic pain associated with cancer and its treatment.

State laws authorizing the use of medical marijuana protect authorized users from criminal prosecution. To date, however, protections in the workplace are basically nonexistent. Out of the 23 states that have legalized medical marijuana, only three have laws that explicitly protect employees who fail drug tests as a result. And this lack of protection can come as a complete surprise to those authorized users.

Even among the few states that protect employees testing positive for medical marijuana, there’s not a state or federal court to date that has required an employer to accommodate medical marijuana use, possession, or impairment in the workplace.

Is Medical Marijuana use protected by the ADA, as amended, or the FMLA?

No… and yes! Even the FMLA and ADA, the federal workhorses of employee medical protections, do not protect medical marijuana use, possession, or impairment in the workplace. In almost every legal case to date, use while working remains a valid reason for termination. However, in states where medical marijuana use has been legalized, if a condition requires an employee to take time off from work to use medical marijuana, that time off would in fact be covered by FMLA. The answer to ADA coverage is “not likely”, but is more complicated due to some individual state ADA statutes.

An employer’s drug free workplace policies may still allow drug testing or require a fitness for duty examination upon returning to work from related FMLA leave. This would, however, come with a risk of the employee claiming a resulting termination was due to retaliation for using FMLA or for the mere existence of their disability. Hence, your policies should be reviewed for legalities, both federal and state.

Drug Tests & a Drug Free Workplace

Employers hiring for safety-sensitive tasks, such as operating machinery, and The Department of Transportation’s oversight of commercial drivers require drug tests for new employees, as do all government contractors.

Drug tests continue to be legal, and can be required of approved users of medical marijuana, provided the employer’s policy has met certain conditions, including:

  • A written policy.
  • Pre-employment testing: A policy that is communicated to applicants via application and/or offer letter (note that laws are state-specific).
  • Post-employment testing: A policy that is communicated to employees via an employee handbook and/or a signed acknowledgement of the written policy.
  • Post-employment testing that’s initiated for appropriate reasons only. All supervisors must be trained on the applicable state law and its definition of “reasonable suspicion”, that likely includes observed physical indications, such as slurring of speech, red and/or watery eyes, trouble walking, or odor on breath or clothes.
  • Consistent enforcement that is uniformly applied.
  • Appropriate documentation.

Drug tests for marijuana can reveal use from days or even weeks in the past. Unlike alcohol, for example, there is currently not a scientifically valid test to confirm recent use or level of impairment for marijuana. It is therefore possible for an employee who uses medical marijuana to fail a drug test, without having violated a drug free workplace policy that prohibits use, possession, and/or impairment at work.

Accommodating Medical Marijuana Use

What is certain – for now – is that employers in all states may tell employees, via a Drug-Free Workplace policy, that they cannot use medical marijuana at work, bring it to work, or be impaired at work.

Outside of these enforceable parameters, some companies voluntarily accommodate their employees’ legal medical marijuana needs, while others – in select states – are required to accommodate employees qualifying through FMLA. Medical marijuana use can be accommodated through:

  • Leaves of absence
  • Modified job duties
  • Flexible schedules
  • Reassignment from safety-sensitive tasks, such as driving or operating machinery

It’s important to note, however, that any voluntary accommodations will set precedents that should be considered against future medical accommodation requests.

Consensus is that a well-written Drug Free Workplace policy remains enforceable.

Medical marijuana, however, is a states’ rights issue, and state laws can change more quickly than federal policies.

This means medical marijuana is likely to remain a headache for employers for some time to come.

Click the link to view the recent INFINITI HR blog: Stressed Staff Can Equal Stressed Profits or check back for more on human resources, payroll, insurance and benefits.